<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hosting on ESM Guide</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/tags/hosting/</link><description>Recent content in Hosting on ESM Guide</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://esm-guide.com/en/tags/hosting/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ITSM, SaaS or self-hosted: how to decide</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/itsm-saas-or-self-hosted/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/itsm-saas-or-self-hosted/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The decision is not about licence price but about five cost lines, of which operations is the most underestimated.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;SaaS transfers operations to the vendor and, in return, fixes the upgrade rhythm.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Self-hosting keeps control of the calendar but assumes a team available in three years, not only today.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Three non-financial constraints often decide before cost: data location, integration depth, internal skills.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="what-the-decision-actually-covers"&gt;What the decision actually covers&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Presented as a choice between two prices, SaaS versus self-hosting is really a choice between two ways of splitting the work. In one, the vendor carries infrastructure, backup and upgrades. In the other, the organisation does, or its integrator.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>