<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Articles on ESM Guide</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/</link><description>Recent content in Articles on ESM Guide</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>ITSM, SaaS or self-hosted: how to decide</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/itsm-saas-or-self-hosted/</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/itsm-saas-or-self-hosted/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The decision is not about licence price but about five cost lines, of which operations is the most underestimated.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;SaaS transfers operations to the vendor and, in return, fixes the upgrade rhythm.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Self-hosting keeps control of the calendar but assumes a team available in three years, not only today.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Three non-financial constraints often decide before cost: data location, integration depth, internal skills.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="what-the-decision-actually-covers"&gt;What the decision actually covers&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Presented as a choice between two prices, SaaS versus self-hosting is really a choice between two ways of splitting the work. In one, the vendor carries infrastructure, backup and upgrades. In the other, the organisation does, or its integrator.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Choosing an ITSM platform: the criteria grid</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/choosing-an-itsm-platform/</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/choosing-an-itsm-platform/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Six criteria genuinely separate ITSM platforms, and functional richness is not among them.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;On core processes, incident, request and change, every serious platform performs alike.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The billing unit, technician or end user, weighs more on five-year cost than any single feature.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The service catalogue is written before the consultation, not after: it is what makes demos comparable.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="what-to-settle-before-looking-at-any-tool"&gt;What to settle before looking at any tool&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Most tenders start with a feature grid sent to vendors. That is the reverse of the order that produces a good decision. Until scope is written down, every vendor answers on its own ground and the answers are not comparable.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Automated IT inventory: the methods compared</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/automated-it-inventory/</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/automated-it-inventory/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Three collection methods coexist: agent, agentless, network discovery by scanning.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The agent returns the most complete software inventory and works outside the corporate network.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Network discovery is the only method that detects unmanageable equipment.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;A real estate almost always combines all three, at different collection frequencies by device type.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="why-manual-inventory-does-not-hold"&gt;Why manual inventory does not hold&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;An IT estate moves constantly: workstations replaced, software installed on user initiative, virtual machines created then forgotten. A manually maintained &lt;strong&gt;IT inventory&lt;/strong&gt; is wrong the day it is published. The question is therefore not whether to automate, but by which method.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>CMDB: what it is for and how to feed it</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/cmdb-explained/</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/cmdb-explained/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;A CMDB records configuration items and, above all, the dependency relationships linking them.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Its primary use is impact analysis, before a change or during a major incident.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;An inventory lists assets, a CMDB adds dependencies: they are two different objects.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Manual population always drifts: automated collection is the only sustainable option.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="what-a-cmdb-actually-contains"&gt;What a CMDB actually contains&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;A &lt;strong&gt;CMDB&lt;/strong&gt;, for Configuration Management Database, records the configuration items of an information system: servers, workstations, applications, services, contracts. But the list is not the point. What separates a CMDB from a spreadsheet is the &lt;strong&gt;relationships&lt;/strong&gt; between those items: which server hosts which database, which database feeds which application, which application delivers which business service.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Defining support SLAs that actually hold</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/defining-support-slas/</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/defining-support-slas/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;An SLA rests on a priority matrix crossing urgency and impact, never on urgency as declared by the requester.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Two distinct commitments are required: response time and restoration time.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Calibration is done on the median actually observed, not on a theoretical target.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Without pausing the clock while waiting on the requester, the metric becomes unfair and stops being used.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="what-an-sla-actually-commits-to"&gt;What an SLA actually commits to&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;A &lt;strong&gt;service level agreement&lt;/strong&gt; is a commitment made to users on measurable turnaround times. It does not describe an ambition, it describes an enforceable promise. This is why an SLA set above the team&amp;rsquo;s real capacity produces the opposite of the intended effect: breaches become the norm, and nobody looks at the indicator any more.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Service desk and help desk: the vocabulary sorted</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/service-desk-vs-help-desk/</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/service-desk-vs-help-desk/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;A help desk handles faults, a service desk handles faults and service requests.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;ITIL keeps only the term service desk, defined as the single point of contact between provider and users.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The three-tier pattern, generalist then specialist then vendor, remains the reference structure.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;First-line resolution rate depends directly on the quality of the knowledge base made available.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="three-terms-three-scopes"&gt;Three terms, three scopes&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;strong&gt;help desk&lt;/strong&gt; emerged from the need to centralise the reporting of IT faults. Its scope is corrective: a user sees a malfunction, reports it, a team fixes it.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Incident and problem management: stop confusing them</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/incident-management-vs-problem-management/</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/incident-management-vs-problem-management/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;An incident is measured in time to restore, a problem in incidents avoided.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;A workaround closes an incident but never closes a problem.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Grouping recurring incidents is the main entry signal for problem management.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;A known error is a problem with an identified cause and a documented workaround, ahead of the permanent fix.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="two-practices-two-clocks"&gt;Two practices, two clocks&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;An &lt;strong&gt;incident&lt;/strong&gt; is an unplanned interruption to a service or a reduction in its quality. The associated practice pursues one objective: restore service as quickly as possible. Restart, fail over, reassign a licence, the means hardly matter, including when they fix nothing fundamental.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ITIL 4: the 7 guiding principles explained</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/itil-4-guiding-principles/</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/itil-4-guiding-principles/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;ITIL 4, published in 2019, places seven guiding principles ahead of its 34 management practices.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;These principles are rules of conduct, not processes to execute: they exist to arbitrate, not to run.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Three of them, start where you are, keep it simple and progress iteratively, are enough to frame most projects.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The framework cannot certify an organisation: that certification falls under the ISO/IEC 20000 standard.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="why-itil-4-starts-with-principles"&gt;Why ITIL 4 starts with principles&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;Earlier ITIL versions mostly described processes. ITIL 4 reverses the order and sets out seven &lt;strong&gt;guiding principles&lt;/strong&gt;, valid in any context, before going into practice detail. The intent is explicit: avoid the mechanical application of a procedure catalogue to an organisation whose actual maturity nobody has examined.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ESM vs ITSM: what actually changes</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/esm-vs-itsm-differences/</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/esm-vs-itsm-differences/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;ITSM and ESM rest on the same objects: service catalogue, ticket, priority, turnaround commitment, knowledge base.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The only structural difference is scope: IT for ITSM, every support function for ESM.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Moving from one to the other is a governance project, not a technical one.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;Three technical capabilities gate the transition: multiple catalogues, multiple assignment queues, partitioned access rights.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="two-acronyms-one-mechanism"&gt;Two acronyms, one mechanism&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;ITSM&lt;/strong&gt; organises the services delivered by the IT department. &lt;strong&gt;ESM&lt;/strong&gt; applies the same reasoning to every function delivering an internal service. The building blocks are identical: describe a service, open a channel to request it, assign the request to someone, commit to a deadline, measure.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Enterprise Service Management: definition and scope</title><link>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/what-is-enterprise-service-management/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://esm-guide.com/en/blog/what-is-enterprise-service-management/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In short:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&#10;&lt;ol&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;ESM applies to non-IT departments the service management practices born in IT: catalogue, request portal, workflows and measured turnaround times.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The four functions most often involved are human resources, facilities, finance and legal.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;An ESM initiative is not a tool purchase: it starts with a written service catalogue and its committed turnaround times.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;li&gt;The ITIL 4 framework describes 34 management practices, a large majority of which apply as-is outside the IT perimeter.&lt;/li&gt;&#10;&lt;/ol&gt;&#10;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#10;&lt;h2 id="what-enterprise-service-management-covers"&gt;What Enterprise Service Management covers&lt;/h2&gt;&#10;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Enterprise Service Management&lt;/strong&gt; means applying, across the whole organisation, the service management principles formalised in IT since the 1990s. The reasoning is straightforward: a badge request sent to facilities and a password reset sent to IT raise exactly the same organisational problem. Who receives it, within what deadline, following which procedure, and how does the requester track progress.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>